POLL: Why did voters reject all three tax proposals in the April 22 special election?

Clark County voters rejected all three tax measures on the April 22 special election ballot, prompting questions about trust, affordability, and communication.

Clark County voters delivered a clear message in the April 22 special election, rejecting all three proposed tax measures. But what drove the outcome? From financial concerns to trust in government, we want to hear your perspective. Take this week’s poll and let us know what you believe was the biggest factor behind the no votes.

Why do you think voters rejected all three tax proposals in the April 22 special election?*
  • 🔺 Rising cost of living — people can't afford higher taxes47.14% (239 votes)
  • 🧾 Lack of trust in how the money will be spent39.45% (200 votes)
  • 📢 Poor communication about the benefits of the measures3.75% (19 votes)
  • ✅ I actually supported one or more of the proposals9.07% (46 votes)
  • ❓ Not sure0.59% (3 votes)
507 votes

This poll is no longer accepting votes

More info:


Also read:

7 Comments

  1. Keith Anvick

    Government never, ever has enough money. They always want more and will make any excuse to get it. Voters have to understand this and vote appropriately….

    Reply
  2. Christine

    The schools keep doubling down on things people don’t want for their kids (DEI teachings, certain health & LGBTQ curriculum, boys in girls sports, etc..) so this is a way to finally say no more money. Keep it up, and we will keep voting no. And keep wondering why enrollment is down along with test scores. One day is might click

    Reply
  3. Brenda

    I see every single day how much waste is in our schools. Money is not helping our schools. Teachers need to teach not do all these extra paperwork. so, so much waste!!!!
    I am tired of higher taxes…make a plan make it work.

    Reply
    1. Mike E

      I agree.Locals may have rejected the levy but my property tax assessment still includes
      the two state assessments for “Sate Schools 1” plus “State Schools 2”.
      Since we cannot vote for or against the State school property taxes will they simply
      impose their will on the property owners and voters?

      Reply
      1. Margaret

        State Schools 1 and State Schools 2 are both for K-12 education, the state funds basic education.Voters input on State school taxes is thru elected representatives and Senators.
        Local levies for K-12 schools go to voters for Extra curricular activities and other spending. I think the Treasurer and Assessor should add the description K-12 for State schools part 1 &2 and also for local levies. Our property tax bill can and should include as much detail as possible.

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *