The proposed light rail extension into Vancouver has sparked a heated debate, with questions arising about Washington taxpayers’ responsibility for funding 45% of the annual operating and maintenance costs.
Some argue this cost-sharing is a fair contribution to an infrastructure project that promises regional benefits. Others contend that it places an undue financial burden on Washington residents for a project driven largely by Oregon’s transit needs.
We want to hear from you!
More info here:
Opinion: TriMet should receive the Golden Fleece Award
John Ley critiques TriMet's funding demands for the IBR, calling it a taxpayer fleecing.
Read more
Make your voice heard and join the conversation! Voting is quick and easy—let us know what you think.
Stay informed about this and other pressing issues at ClarkCountyToday.com.
Also read:
- Safer pedestrian crossing coming to SR 503 near Prairie High School in Vancouver
New HAWK signal boosts safety for pedestrians crossing SR 503 near Prairie High School in Vancouver. - Should Washington Taxpayers Shoulder 45% of Light Rail Costs? Share Your Thoughts!Debate intensifies over Washington taxpayers funding 45% of light rail costs.
- Emergency pavement repairs on SR 14 West Camas Slough Bridge begin Jan. 7Emergency pavement repairs on the aging SR 14 West Camas Slough Bridge begin Jan. 7 after heavy rainfall worsened existing damage.
- Opinion: How speed limits are setDoug Dahl of The Wise Drive explains how speed limits are determined and their role in traffic safety.
- Opinion: TriMet should receive the Golden Fleece AwardJohn Ley critiques TriMet’s funding demands for the IBR, calling it a taxpayer fleecing.
wpDiscuz
